Feedback on: Are all Portals the same?

irt.org | About | Feedback | 635 [ previous next ]

Feedback on:
Are all Portals the same?

Sent by
phil rustage on December 01, 1999 at 07:46:15:

Worth:
Very worth reading

Length:
Just right

Technical:
Just right

Comments:
Excellent article, well paced and clearly explained. I had heard the term "portal" a lot recently and although I thought I knew roughly what it meant your article brought it all into crystal clarity.

BUT you do seem to have a difficulty in distinguishing singular from plural. I know this may sound pedantic but all those (and there are many) examples of saying "is" when you mean "are" and "was" when you mean "were", all those single verbs with plural pronouns just interrupt the otherwise smooth flow of a good article. Making the reader have to go back and read certain sentences again because a grammatical error has caused confusion is a real pity when the content and general style is so good. Why not get someone to proof read it for you?

Other feedback on 'Are all Portals the same?' - show all

• Are all Portals the same? - Shravan 17:03:06 3/16/01
• Are all Portals the same? - Markus Egbert 13:06:48 6/27/00
• Are all Portals the same? - cvgunasekaran 02:39:55 5/27/00
• Are all Portals the same? - Spiderboy 11:56:47 3/16/00
• Are all Portals the same? - phil rustage 07:46:15 12/01/99
• Are all Portals the same? - jim franklin 17:23:40 9/09/99